Let's say in The Final Season, you have a choice to keep either Clem or AJ alive, who would you choose?
I'd honestly choose AJ.
Let's say in The Final Season, you have a choice to keep either Clem or AJ alive, who would you choose?
I'd honestly choose AJ.
AJ Lost his innocence much younger before Clementine's age(when Clem was an child depending on Lee's actions she could or not kill an man namely, the Stranger in S1.), he is likely an child with psychopatic tendencies by the way he killed Marlon without feeling any remose much like Carver did with Walter and Reggie.
While there is no denying that AJ lost is innocence at a much younger age, to say he is a psychopath is somewhat laughable and almost idiototic. Yes, he did kill Marlon by shooting him in the back of the head. But did he know what he was doing? Did he know that Marlon had given himself up? My guess is that he assumed he was going to try and hurt Clem or the Group and "magically" got the gun that was taken from him and shot. For all we know he could have thought he was protecting Clem and thought that that was the right way to do it. Now we, the lowly humans, know fully well the rights and wrongs, specially at a youngish age, but we don't know fully what lessons Clem taught him and has yet to teach, the rights and wrongs of how to handle people. Plus, if we look back to the Train Station and with Abel, AJ is used to listening to Clem tell him what to do, and while later he says that it was "weak" to let him go, we are given and option to tell him that either sometimes you have to pick your fights and know when to fight/flee or tell him that it is Clems responibility to protect him and make the decisions and that its AJs duty to watch and learn.
That all said... I do kinda hope to either gently or perhaps aggessively tell AJ that what he did was wrong and to make that a painful lesson to learn.
So for the record: Let us stop ASSUMING we know who AJ is and how right/wrong he should act. (Like saying he is a psychopath) smh. This is, for the record, the first time we really have interacted with AJ. So to assume he is a deranged psychopath who has no feelings is very much like saying Kenny was one, or Jane, or hell anyone in the entire franchise. So lets hold our horses, go through the entire season, then review who AJ is and not before then.
I think its possible we might get an PLOT TWIST in the end uknow, TT might not want to follow an predictable "Lee Death Scenario" like from the original first season, where Clementine had to put down Lee in order for the poor man to not become Walker besides it would be GREAT if we had an UNPREDICTABLE and INNOVATED ending/story in the fourth and final season and the main OBJECTIVE was to mold Alvin Junior as we could see more fit in the post-apocalyptic world much like we could in S1 WIth Lee teaching Clem ir order for her to surivive, by killing Marlon in the end REGARLESS of what we say/teach Alvin in the game might indicate that he will become an antagonist in the end of S4, this is just an THEORY so don't call my theories "IDIOTIC" or "LAUGHABLE" ok? This an FREESPEECH wikia, anyone can say whatever they want as long its stays in the point of the subject.
tesshu made an interesting point because technically he is related to carver so maybe part of that did get carried on 2 A.J i'm not saying he is carver's kid but he had no reason to lie that he was A.J's father plus A.J seemed like a drive to Carver to ya know keep on searching
HOW did your comment turn from a theory INTO something about FREE SPEECH? ALSO, don't type with random capitalized words like I just did, unless you want to sound angry.
Dude or dudette is just angry and apparently easily worked up over what I said. Take a chill pill. Sheesh.
I wasn't angry was just stating an theory, that is all.
Maybe???? But how could AJ be an anagonist if he's just a kid? ^_^