Why is Clementine’s page locked? Episode 2 came out and we still need to update it. I’m so confused on why it’s locked. Her page still needs major editing.
Why is Clementine’s page locked? Episode 2 came out and we still need to update it. I’m so confused on why it’s locked. Her page still needs major editing.
Mitt Campbell wrote: The page is unlocked so why there is so much arguing?
No it is not; we can't edit it. We can view it but that's it.
And, I still don't see how this is an argument; if disagreeing with someone about something instantly made any conversation they had on the matter an argument, then I'd had to see what a "proper" argument would be like.
Mitt Campbell wrote: The page is unlocked so why there is so much arguing?
And, I still don't see how this is an argument; if disagreeing with someone about something instantly made any conversation they had on the matter an argument, then I'd had to see what a "proper" argument would be like.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/argument
I'd like you to read the first definition if you will.
Then refer back to this quote by a certain Snivystorm:
"And yes, that's why it is locked so we can have this discussion without edit warring; discuss it as mature adults should."
RazeSpear wrote: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/argument
I'd like you to read the first definition if you will.
Then refer back to this quote by a certain Snivystorm:
"And yes, that's why it is locked so we can have this discussion without edit warring; discuss it as mature adults should."
I'd like you to read the "c" definition on that quote: "an angry quarrel"; I detect no anger, maybe pedantic nit-picking but certainly not anger.
And you quoted me why? To also reiterate that discussions are better than edit wars? If so, sweet! Discussions are always the best way to sort matters out. :D
And, just to clarify any difference between the two, here's the definition of discussion you appear to have forgot to compare: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discussion
RazeSpear wrote: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/argument
I'd like you to read the first definition if you will.
Then refer back to this quote by a certain Snivystorm:
"And yes, that's why it is locked so we can have this discussion without edit warring; discuss it as mature adults should."
And you quoted me why? To also reiterate that discussions are better than edit wars? If so, sweet! Discussions are always the best way to sort matters out. :D
And, just to clarify any difference between the two, here's the definition of discussion you appear to have forgot to compare: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discussion
The secondary definitions are always, by nature, secondary to the leading definition. Also, for the definition of discussion you linked me to, please check the first synonym. Arguments do not have to be angry.
I think we're arguing, this wiki thinks we're arguing, and the dictionary thinks we're arguing.
Do you get off to being a minority opinion? Starting to think that's how you get your jollies.
RazeSpear wrote: Do you get off to being a minority opinion? Starting to think that's how you get your jollies.
You're the one who linked the definition - all I did was respond. What's wrong with my opinion on a matter differing to yours? Would you rather everyone think the same, act the same, talk the same, have no diversity, individuality or unique characteristics?
Also, you're distracting from the topic within this discussion. If you want to talk about difference of opinion, minute word definitions and other matters, why not do it on our respective talk pages or open another discussion? Why must we clog this discussion up with such pedantic word definitions?
RazeSpear wrote: Do you get off to being a minority opinion? Starting to think that's how you get your jollies.
Also, you're distracting from the topic within this discussion. If you want to talk about difference of opinion, minute word definitions and other matters, why not do it on our respective talk pages or open another discussion? Why must we clog this discussion up with such pedantic word definitions?
The viewpoint on Clementine widely considers opinion, the definition of an argument does not.
An argument is synonymous with discussings regarding opposing viewpoints.
This is an argument. Saying it's not does not make it so.
RazeSpear wrote: The viewpoint on Clementine widely considers opinion, the definition of an argument does not.
An argument is synonymous with discussings regarding opposing viewpoints.
This is an argument. Saying it's not does not make it so.
"Yes it is" "No it is not"
That is a contradiction, not an argument or discussion. There's no justification, evidence, interpretation there, just straight up contradicting.
RazeSpear wrote: The viewpoint on Clementine widely considers opinion, the definition of an argument does not.
An argument is synonymous with discussings regarding opposing viewpoints.
This is an argument. Saying it's not does not make it so.
"No it is not"
That is a contradiction, not an argument or discussion. There's no justification, evidence, interpretation there, just straight up contradicting.
Citing the dictionary is evidence... I'm not using blatant contradiction.
You're the one with no basis for what you say.
I cite the nature of bisexuality, you deflect with nothing but rhetoric.
I cite Telltale's writers' past decisions with Javi on this same issue. You deflect by spouting about your own personal take on the importance of player choice.
I cite a solid, concrete dictionary definition of a word. You move a couple of definitions down and act like it's the only definition that matters.
I used rhetoric, in addition to all of this, to scold you for not thinking straight. You use this as an opportunity to deflect by ignoring everything prior, because "Haha. You made a few quips instead of citing even more than you had to."
It's simply baffling. You have nothing. Why even comment?
RazeSpear wrote:
RazeSpear wrote: The viewpoint on Clementine widely considers opinion, the definition of an argument does not.
An argument is synonymous with discussings regarding opposing viewpoints.
This is an argument. Saying it's not does not make it so.
"No it is not"
That is a contradiction, not an argument or discussion. There's no justification, evidence, interpretation there, just straight up contradicting.
Citing the dictionary is evidence... I'm not using blatant contradiction.
You're the one with no basis for what you say.
I cite the nature of bisexuality, you deflect with rhetoric.
I cite Telltale's writers' past decisions with Javi on this same issue. You deflect by spouting about your own personal take on the importance of player choice.
I cite a solid, concrete dictionary definition of a word. You move a couple of definitions down and act like it's the only definition that matters.
I used rhetoric, in addition to all of this, to scold you for not thinking straight. You use this as an opportunity to deflect by ignoring everything prior, because "Haha. You made a few quips instead of citing even more than you had to."
It's simply baffling. You have nothing. Why even comment?
I have no money, no resources, no hope. I am the happiest man alive. - Henry Miller.
All I've done is voice my opinion, as free speech gracefully allows me to do.
On the contradiction, one of us appears to have misinterpreted the others comment. I inferred you mean me disagreeing with you makes an argument, so I corrected. "Scolding" me for not sharing your views ("thinking straight"?) is hardly polite now is it?
Perhaps, given you're not going to stop nit-picking me, I propose an administrator close this thread, state whether Clementine's page will say "Determinant" or not (evidently the latter given majority rules) and leave it there.
This petty back and forth over definitions is going nowhere now and is completely off topic.