DalesRV

  • I was born on January 7
  • My occupation is Student
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Would you like to visit my thread and post your own predictions?

      Loading editor
  • Hello. So I wanted to ask, what did you think of Fear S5's first episode? I personally found it good but I still found problems with it that put it under "great" for me. Mainly how the characters would act at times or how Annie wouldn't tell Alicia why the area was dangerous. I understand why they made her not answer the question but it still would've been nice to avoid a cliche like that. I will give it some props for how it feels a lot more focused now and that the characters all felt important in their own way. Overall, I'd say it's a good introduction to the season and how it's setting up things for both the season itself and stuff like the Rick movies.

      Loading editor
    • View all 28 replies
    • Domitron3 wrote: It is something, yes lol. And I can understand why some people wouldn't like it. I can definitely see episode 2 being better with Daniel coming back in-person. Strand and Daniel's interactions in seasons 2 and 3 were some of my favorite parts of the seasons so that'll be an automatic plus from me. Knowing Dwight comes back the episode after is also nice.

      I definitely can't wait to see more of the old rivalry between Daniel and Strand.

        Loading editor
    • Me too. I'm interested to see what they'll do with Morgan and Dwight because (I think) they never interacted in the main show.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey. Just asking if you want to chime in on something: https://walkingdead.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:413825

      Loading editor
    • Just gonna point this out...

      I've never gone looking for friends to come help me.

      I explain myself.

      Every time.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Ok, sure.

    ...but who wouldn't be smart enough to know that a person is single if their spouse is listed with the word "deceased" right there next to their name?

    Especially since any future spouse after a remarriage would be listed immediately after? It's totally pointless (and incorrect) but, okay. I'll leave it like that on pages then. Cheers.

      Loading editor
    • View all 22 replies
    • This reply has been removed
    • Remember that time I wasn't spouting nonsense?

      Here you go: https://definedterm.com/former_spouse

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello Dale!

    I saw your message and since I was online, I unlocked Rick's page for you!

      Loading editor
  • Theres alreafy been a duscussuon and admins have weighed in. Please stoo making mistajes just because you've fallen behind.

      Loading editor
    KeepOnKeepingOn
    KeepOnKeepingOn closed this thread because:
    Resolved
    16:38, April 26, 2019
    • View all 18 replies
    • I had a civil discussion.

      That's what explaining one's self is.

      ...and then I kept getting reverted and bossed around.

      Glad it's over too.

      It never should have started.

        Loading editor
    • You were not entirely civil. You acted rather rude from the get go. Sorry dude but next time try to explain yourself and the discrepancies more calmly instead of telling Dale to go look over and over. Dale made numerous attempts to stop the argument but you were still acting a tad uncivilized.

      I’m just letting you know for next time dude.

        Loading editor
  • is craig the leader of the marauders? i thought andy is...

      Loading editor
    • I thought so too, but I read the issue again and it was Craig who was giving orders to the other two Marauders initially (he tells them to get Rick and Carl out of the car). He is also the one with the gun, and since you'd expect the leader to be the best armed in a group like that, I'd say he's more likely to be the leader.

        Loading editor
    • okay, thanks for explanation..

        Loading editor
    • Np

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • hello rv, can you tell me which issue your avatar taken from??

      Loading editor
  • Hey man. I know what you mean, but the reason I undo it was that killing someone doesn´t make you to become an antagonist. If we have to categorize every single charater that killed someone, then we can add Carol or Daryl too. The role of the antagonist in the story is to antagonize the protagonists and they must have their motives to do so and the reason why they are killing, for example "The Governor". Lizzie is just a twisted girl, who doesn´t have motives behind it. So that´s why she is not an antagonist. And we never categorize her as an antagonist so there is the reason behind it. It also means that her Comic counterpart, Ben, is also not an antagonist.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • I mean you have a good point too. It is really hard to suggest this subject.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, that's why the Ben story arc is one of my favourite in the comics.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello there,

    I talked with another admin and we both agreed that this category isn't really necessary: we already have the category "Amputated Victims" that, even if it is more generally, it fits for any amputation, head included. So, to avoid any duplicate, we are going to remove it, but I wanted to tell you that before doing anything. Have a good one! 

      Loading editor
    • Oh ok, I wasn't aware that the "Amputated" category included decapitations. Sorry about that :/

        Loading editor
    • No worries, it's not a big deal! Anything is fixable :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.