It's okay, we already knew before the episode was leaked that DJ would be in a flashback so I don't consider it too bad. It's just that since it's from a scene taken from the episode before it has aired, it shouldn't be on his page until it does.
He was in 21 episodes. Thats 4 more than Dale, 3 more than Bob, 7 more than Merle, 3 more than Shane (all listed as mains ) yet you see him as a supporting?? Hell DWIGHT is listed as a main in The Walking Dead and he is not even in the show anymore! I dont know, is this fandom as biased to poor old T as the writers were? We all loved him, he was part of the family, he gave his life to save a main, he is a main.
I think you're taking this a bit too seriously. He's a supporting character because his actor was never signed on as a series regular, he was just a guest star. Dwight however was a series regular. Austin himself was signed on as one. I mean, Judith's been in over 60 episodes now and hasn't been listed as a main character. Why? Because she isn't a series regular as of now.
' Originally, T-Dog was only supposed to appear in a couple of episodes in Season 1, but Singleton's role expanded into a recurring one with the actor eventually becoming a series regular, with T-Dog finally being a full-fledged main character by the time he died'. Since T-Dog was a character unique to "The Walking Dead" television series -- he doesn't exist in the comics -- Singleton said he enjoyed getting to watch the character grow.
No disrespect but the writers at CBR get paid for doing this, you dont. So what if he showed in in also starrting all the time? Daryll and Carol have appeared in that section, so by your logic they should be listed as part main part guest? Just let T dog be invloved man!
No disrespect but I really don't care if they're paid for saying stuff or not. You can call any character a main character. The format we have is that we call characters a main character if they became a series regular. T-Dog was never a series regular so we don't list him as such. This will be my final response to this because you refuse to listen and this will ultimately go nowhere. Have a good day.
I think that can work. I originally thought the user assumed he appeared in the webisodes so I changed it back to (Fear), as the other characters who just appeared in that webisode have (Flight 462) in their titles. I also remembered that there's a Tom mentioned in S2 of the main show, so a solution to all of this that I thought of is Deirdre, Anthony, and Connie's pages can be changed to (Webisodes), thus Tom's page can be changed back to (Flight 462) without any assumptions that the title refers to the main show's Tom or that he appeared in the webisodes. Thoughts on the idea?
Hmm good points, maybe Tom (Season 2) and Tom (Season 5) is the best way to go. I’d be okay with changing Tom to Tom (Flight 462) and still use that title for Connie, Anthony, etc. Rather not have (Webisodes) and (Flight 462) both used at the same time.
Having more time to think about it, Tom (Season 2) is what I'd personally change it to. Also while on the subject, I feel like Corporal Cole and PFC Richards' pages should be renamed to something like Cole (Season 1) and Richards (Military), as we have two Cole's and Richards' in Fear.
Now that June's page has been changed to June Dorie it's probably best to change the links on the seasons 4-6 survivors before they become broken links. Also, would it be a spoiler if I put the new Alexandrians in the S10 premiere in the order in which they appeared first?
Thanks, I got it. I'm not sure if I like what prompts these young people to leave the community but we don't know much yet so I'll give it a chance. Hopefully its good. I'm looking forward to seeing what a 9000+ person community looks like in the post apocalypse. Hope and Iris seem cool, I just hope it's not a dumb teen drama, lol.
Same, I hope the reason doesn't immediately make my eyes roll. It looks interesting though, I'll give it that, and it looks really good visually too. I'm interested to see how they've been able to live somewhat normal lives all this time while our main group's been struggling to survive ever since the start.
Did we include "member of the militia" for those who were in it in S7/S8? If so, then I don't see why not. There seems to be certain extras who are soldiers for the coalition, so the position exists, and I think we can include it for folks like Oscar, Gage, Margo, etc. bc they've clearly been training to be a soldier.
Hello. Now that we know what the Lucy from Alexandria looks like, should the Lucy in S10 have her page name changed to (Season 10) again and change the Alexandria one to (Season 6), or would you prefer to wait and see if the S10 Lucy is part of a community and change her title based on that?
Before making any changes, I thought I should ask if Gamma's page could be changed to Mary now. In Skybound's recap of the newest episode, they call Gamma "Mary", but I wanted to make sure if their word is enough to be considered official information before doing anything.
Hello. I saw that you added that Kyle appears in 10x03. I rewatched the scenes with the council and couldn't see him. Would you be able to point out where he is in the episode? Also, Alfred should probably be under the Highwaymen on the S9 survivors, as Margo's under it.
Yeah, always bad luck when it comes to large meeting scenes with extras. Like how half the church was excluded from the final version in 7x04. Happy to see he made it in tonight's council meeting scene.
Hello! So I've been wondering for a while, would it be alright if the "(Archive Footage)" stuff was just changed to "(Flashback)"? I mean, I understand what it means by archive footage, but I think flashback makes more sense.
I think they use "Archive Footage" to indicate that it was from a previous episode, instead of scene filmed for that episode as a flashback. I think being able to identify and notate the differences between the two is important. I get what you are saying though. Maybe we can change it to "Flashback" but note under trivia if it was archive footage?
As trivia it is unnecessary. If we put stuff like that as trivia nearly all the kids from Ericson's would have that, since a lot of their ages have been said to be different ages from different developers.
I think it's been settled mostly as of now. If it continues I'll ask an admin to temporarily lock the page and give them a source so they can put it in their edit summary. Also, the idea isn't actually a bad one, I just don't want users putting stuff like "[Character's] age has been debated on" or something along those lines on other pages.
I'm curious, should Alvin be Determinant instead of Dead? There are other characters who are either Dead or Undead, and I think that's the case with Alvin. The others who had this distinction were also counted as Determinant, so I think that should be corrected. I don't know, what do you think of this?
The rule is if they die, but we don't see them reanimate, they're marked as dead, unless specified otherwise by the writers. Someone from Carver's group could have put Alvin down, or the zombies got to him before he turned. We don't know. The only thing we know for sure is he's dead.