A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Yo real talk.

      Loading editor
    • View all 9 replies
    • Ducktales37 wrote:
      FightingSpirit93 wrote:
      Ducktales37 wrote:
      pardon?
      I'm Being Real. Really really real. I'm real. Its time to get real. Let's get real and talk real talk. REAL TALK, REAL TALK.
      i understood, i really did. knock it off.

      I did

        Loading editor
    • I'm just letting everybody know that I'm being real from now on. Only real talk, no joking or anything else just real talk.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey Ducktales! I was thinkin' about the new category for those who've been decapitated. I feel like it would be best to only include people who were killed via decapitation (Hershel tv, Alpha comics, Enid tv ect ect) instead of putting people who were dead at the time of their head being removed. I think this would just keep it consistant. Plus, it's "decapitated victims" so it makes more sense to have only those who were decapitated while they were alive! Don't you agree? Thanks!

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • it doesn't or does matter, both are decapitated, i think..

        Loading editor
    • Ducktales37 wrote: it doesn't or does matter, both are decapitated, i think..

      It doesn’t matter for the already deceased.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Thanks for your help on reverting edits. On the user who is vandalizing. And thanks as well for reporting the user.

      Loading editor
  • Would you like to check out my season ten death predictions?

      Loading editor
  • Hello Duck!

    In my opinion the "turned" category is unnecessary... and like it's already been stated, it can be confused with the "undeads" category. I have to agree with Elfrax on this and I don't blame him for confusing it with the "undeads" category.

    HOWEVER, if you ask the other administrators and they are fine with your suggestion, I don't have a problem. However, once again, you will have to use a different name for the specific category, in order to prevent confusion.

    Thank you for understanding and have a great day! 

      Loading editor
  • Hello Ducktales,

    I was not completely aware about the "Turned" category, for this reason I am writing only now about it to warn you that we will proceed to remove the category because, besides being able to create confusion with the "undeads" category, it is not really necessary, it would be enough add "and later an antagonist" to characters that are not initially. Having also talked about it with another admin, we kindly ask you to warn us in the near future about adding new categories that involve massive modifications, this being not the first time. Don't take it personally, the categories are a fairly delicate discourse. Thank you!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Ducktales, the pages you created are not needed, especially if they are part of a stage background for Tekken. I spoke to another admin and we agreed that these pages should be removed. At best, these Saviors belong in The Saviors (Tekken) Gallery, but don't need individual pages. I wanted to let you know first before I remove them. It just doesn't make sense for these guys to have individual pages.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Ducktales. It was brought to my attention by a couple users that you had created the Inactive category. After discussing it with another admin, we feel that it is not necessary to include that, as it essentially includes every group/community in the show that is not in the present storyline. It's just a little redundant, so we will be removing the category. However, this was a bit of a big move you did and will take some time to un-do everything. Next time, please reach out to an admin first before enacting such a large change, so we can avoid these kind of situations. Thanks.

      Loading editor
  • Hey there,

    I was talking with Mistertrouble189 about the several pages that you created about the Save-Lots bandits.

    Some of them are super really minor characters, who barely appears or says anything. Usually we put them in the Background Survivors (Video Game) if they have at least a good image and a bit of informations, so we was thinking to delete the character pages and put them in there.

    About this, if you want, you can add them yourself on that page obviously. I wanted to say you that before deleting the pages to avoid any misunderstanding. Have a good one! 

      Loading editor
    • but when i added these survivors in background survivors, mistertrouble deleted this. what is this??

        Loading editor
    • i think these pages are good, even if they are minor characters. these pages should not be deleted. they are bandits like other bandits. what do u mind??

        Loading editor
    • Hey Duck, you created a subpage for the background survivors page, that wasn’t needed (see the Woodbury or Hilltop background survivors subpages for a good example to see what deserves a subpage and what doesn’t). These bandits deserve a section on the video game background page, not a subpage.

        Loading editor
    • They are super minor, very minuscule, and aren’t worthy of a page. That’s like creating a page for all 200 Woodbury extras, etc. some of the other bandits can probably have pages but not all.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, can you help me voting for me in the admiship section? I would appreciate it.

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.