Should we make a category for all members of the Coalition, or is that unnecessary? Just wanted to get other opinions before I went ahead and did it. JackDelMars (talk)

  • If we have a category for the prison, Woodbury, the Saviors, the militia from AOW, etc., then I don’t see why not for the Coalition! —Mistertrouble189 (talk) 21:40, March 23, 2019 (UTC)

What category? SpaceBeyonder (talk) 21:38, March 23, 2019 (UTC)

In regards to minor and supporting characters

There’s a lot of back and forth as to who to include in the main list of survivors, and if kids like RJ and Gracie belong, and etc. Rather than tussle back and forth editing them in and undoing them, should we just add a section at the bottom of the main list called “Supporting members”, “Minor members”, or “Background members” and have them listed there, and in small font what community they are from? That way, no one gets excluded, but they aren’t exactly added in a list reserved for members who contribute in bigger ways. That way we can concentrate on the meat and potatoes of the page. Zalbaag (talk) 16:21, March 28, 2019 (UTC)

  • I think the list should be of main characters and supporting characters that contribute to the group (Magna's Group, Dianne, Kal, etc.). Your idea sounds good too. SpaceBeyonder (talk) 16:25, March 28, 2019 (UTC)
  • I do feel as though minor and supporting characters should be included in some way though. They may be side characters but they ARE part of the Coalition. So a list below the main contributors may be the best route. Zalbaag (talk) 18:28, March 28, 2019 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.