(Created page with "No, you are adding it to a bunch of characters. They did not have informaiton on birth year before. Birth years are not canon therefore I disagree they should be there. Since ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
No, you are adding it to a bunch of characters. They did not have informaiton on birth year before. Birth years are not canon therefore I disagree they should be there. Since it's not canon information it shouldn't be there until an admin approves it (which in my opinion it shouldn't be since it's so much more narrow than the estimated ages, and those are just estimates to begin with).
+
No, you are adding it to a bunch of characters. They did not have information on birth year before. Birth years are not canon therefore I disagree they should be there. Since it's not canon information it shouldn't be there until an admin approves it (which in my opinion it shouldn't be since it's so much more narrow than the estimated ages, and those are just estimates to begin with).

Latest revision as of 22:25, October 20, 2019

No, you are adding it to a bunch of characters. They did not have information on birth year before. Birth years are not canon therefore I disagree they should be there. Since it's not canon information it shouldn't be there until an admin approves it (which in my opinion it shouldn't be since it's so much more narrow than the estimated ages, and those are just estimates to begin with).

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.